Satisfy positive duty through 7 standards: corporate lawyer

Complying with the positive duty to prevent workplace sexual harassment will require a fundamental reset, but the question of how organisations can achieve a proactive stance has already been answered, a senior employment lawyer says.


Ampol Australia senior corporate counsel Damien Marshall said that when the positive duty to prevent sexual harassment was first proposed, most HR practitioners and employment lawyers believed it would be impossible to comply with, because traditionally a harassment incident needed to occur before any action was taken.


"That complaint is a product of the way in which the [anti-discrimination] law has historically been drafted, and also a product of our practice," he told the Australian Catholic University research symposium on workplace wellbeing and psychological health and safety in Sydney this week.

The positive duty was "really simple when you think about it from a health and safety perspective", he said.

But it was "very difficult from a tried and tested and practised HR perspective, where we only act once the event has occurred and once the complaint has been made".


Under changes to the Commonwealth Sex Discrimination Act 1984 that commenced late 2022 (see related article), employers now have a positive duty to eliminate workplace sexual harassment and discrimination as far as is possible.


Where the Australian Human Rights Commission previously needed to rely on victims of sexual harassment to step forward with a complaint, it now has proactive powers to conduct inquiries into an employer's compliance with the anti-harassment positive duty and enforce compliance (see related article).

"[It can] go to the employer and say 'We don't have complaints, we don't have to name anyone, but you need to show us, the Commission, what you are doing to take reasonable proportionate steps to eliminate or prevent sexual harassment'," Marshall said.


"That, I suggest to you, is just as good as a named complainant, because it puts the onus in the employer to show what they're doing to prevent [sexual harassment]," he said.


"If a view has been formed that [sexual harassment] is occurring, it's going be very, very hard for an employer to show they've taken adequate steps to prevent it."


According to Marshall, how employers can get ahead on this has already been answered by the Australian Human Rights Commission in its guidelines for complying with the positive duty under the SD Act, released last year (see related article).


The guidelines outline "seven standards" (see image below) around what the Commission expects organisations to do to satisfy their positive duty, to help them put "meat on the bones" in terms of discharging this duty, Marshall said.



Under these standards, all leadership teams should be trained on issues relating to discrimination, harassment and bullying, and how to respond to complaints, Marshall advised.


Company leaders need to show workers that they are invested in tackling sexual harassment and be seen to treat such issues seriously, he said.


Companies need to leverage knowledge, using data and prior complaints to inform them where the risks are in their organisations; they need to ask where complaints are occurring, whether in a particular department or during certain events that occur at work.

"Monitoring, evaluation and transparency" are key, Marshall said.


"Does your board or does your governing body, depending on how you are structured, get clear data about complaints that have been made?" he asked.

"And do they get the data on what the organisation's done about it? If the answer's no, well that will feed back to number one [leaders] because the leadership won't necessarily drive or demand action."


The seven standards will help organisations move away from a reactive to a proactive stance on sexual harassment, "where we take control of our culture, we take control of our information, and we do things to significantly minimise the possibility of this stuff occurring", Marshall said.


“This article has been reproduced with permission from OHS Alert, and the original version appears at www.ohsalert.com.au” 




Contact Us

Zenergy News

Directors' duties for psych risks unpacked in new report
April 23, 2025
The WHS obligations of company directors include taking reasonable steps to understand the psychological hazards in their workplaces, and this is a "personal" prosecutable duty, a new guide for directors warns. Directors' obligations include establishing that their organisations and their management "are equipped with appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise these risks to the extent that is reasonably practicable", the guide by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and law firm King & Wood Mallesons says. Most of any organisation's work to address psychosocial hazards will be "driven by management", given the complexity of the risks and the deep operational knowledge required to guide action, it says. "The board plays a supporting role in constructively challenging these efforts and maintaining oversight of how effective psychosocial risk management contributes to broader organisational culture and leadership." Under Australia's national model WHS laws – adopted by all jurisdictions other than Victoria, which has similar legislation – officers have a duty to exercise due diligence to confirm their organisation is meeting its WHS obligations. (See section 27 of NSW's version of the laws, for example.) This duty is a "personal duty, meaning [officers] can be prosecuted for failing to meet their due diligence obligations", the guide says. "Prosecution typically requires proof that the officer failed to take reasonable steps to comply with their duty, assessed in the context of the organisation's overall safety and health management system," it says. These due diligence obligations apply to paid directors, and are "recommended" for volunteer directors, who can be prosecuted in limited circumstances. "While non-executive directors have not been the focus of WHS regulators to date, this can change, and regulatory expectations are rising," the guide notes. According to the 12-page document , company boards and governance play a crucial role in ensuring psychosocial risks are managed effectively. Directors must oversee management's efforts at identifying and implementing control measures, set expectations and confirm that the necessary frameworks are in place. "This includes seeking information, reviewing board reports, assessing organisational culture, and challenging management where needed to strengthen risk controls," the guide says. Examples of how boards should address the workplace factors that create psychosocial risks include: Overseeing how managers monitor the risks associated with work design by drawing on complaints data, employee surveys, and absence and turnover rates, and engaging regularly with management to assess risks and evaluate measures; Confirming that management is complying with the positive duty to eliminate workplace sexual harassment, and obtaining regular reports on key behavioural risks involving code of conduct breaches and harassment cases; Setting expectations for management to provide workers with practical assistance and timely consultation in the event of organisational change and restructures, which can create significant stress; Engaging with management to review how it is addressing remote work risks, and ensuring there they have a clear policy to guide them in determining when remote arrangements are appropriate; and Overseeing how HR and performance management processes are managed, and confirming that investigation procedures are fair, workers have access to appropriate support, and outcomes are handled as consistently as possible. Governing WHS Psychosocial Risks: A primer for directors, by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and King & Wood Mallesons, April 2025 This article has been reproduced with permission from OHS Alert, and the original version appears at www.ohsalert.com.au.
April 7, 2025
Zenergy recently hosted Women in Safety, a special networking event dedicated to fostering collaboration in the health, safety, and wellbeing sector. Held on March 20, 2025, at The Winery, Surry Hills, this event provided a relaxed and welcoming atmosphere where professionals gathered to exchange insights, share experiences, and build meaningful connections. With attendees from diverse industries—including construction, logistics, corporate sectors, and more—the event highlighted the vital role of women in shaping safer workplaces across Australia.
March 25, 2025
Podcasts have become a dominant force in the world of media, revolutionising how we consume information and entertainment and the WHS, Environment & Sustainability is no different! As the podcast industry continues to expand, listeners are discovering a wealth of benefits, from educational insights to fostering community connections. In this article, we share some of the leading podcasts and why they’ve become a growing part of modern WHS, Environment & Sustainability consumption. Here are some of the leading podcasts that every WHS, Environmental, and Sustainability professional should tune into:
March 24, 2025
Colin Hansen, WHS Director John Holland - M7M12 Project
March 3, 2025
Zenergy invites you to be part of the prestigious 2025 Australian Workplace Health & Safety Awards (AWHSA) —a national platform dedicated to recognising outstanding achievements in workplace health and safety. These awards celebrate individuals and organisations that are making a real impact in fostering safer, healthier work environments.
February 28, 2025
Australia has enacted mandatory sustainability reporting requirements, effective from 1 January 2025, through the Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Act 2024. These regulations mandate that large entities disclose climate-related financial information as part of their annual reporting obligations.
More Posts