First-aid and medical treatment injuries: how do they differ?

Q


Most organisations make the distinction between first aid injuries (FAIs) and medical treatment injuries (MTIs). However, AS1885 only defines lost time injuries (LTIs) and non-LTIs. Are FAI and MTI defined in any other Standard? If not, where are these terms defined?

A


As the enquirer correctly points out, AS1885 does not define and distinguish between FAIs and MTIs.


An explanation of these terms could not be located in any other Standard or workers compensation legislation, nor is one offered by the July 1999 publication of National Occupational Health and Safety Commission (NOHSC) entitled Type of Occurrence Classification System.


Furthermore, while Australia’s Work Health and Safety (WHS) legislation defines when an injury or illness is considered serious, it does not distinguish between FAIs and MTIs.


A sensible explanation comes from Curtin University in Western Australia, which states that “these injury classifications are designed to meet legislative requirements outlined in the OSH Act, OHS Regulations, and AS 1885.1”:


First aid injuries


A first aid injury (FAI) is an injury that requires a single first aid treatment and a follow-up visit for subsequent observation involving only minor injuries (minor scratches, burns, cuts and so forth) which do not ordinarily require medical care, and for which the person would typically return immediately to their normal activities. Such treatment and observation is considered first aid even if it is administered by a physician or registered medical professional.


Typical treatments normally considered as first aid injuries include:


Application of antiseptics during a first visit to medical personnel;

Treatment of minor (first degree) burns;

Application of bandages (including elastic bandages) during a first visit to medical personnel;

Irrigation of eye injuries and removal of non-embedded objects;

Removal of foreign bodies from a wound using tweezers or other simple first aid technique;

Use of non-prescription medication (schedule 2 or 3 medications), and administration of a single dose of prescription medication on a first visit to medical personnel for minor injury or discomfort.

Soaking, application of hot-cold compresses, and use of elastic bandage on sprains immediately after injury (initial treatment only);

Application of ointments for abrasions to prevent drying or cracking;

One time administration of oxygen, for example after exposure to toxic atmosphere; and

Observations of injury during visits to medical personnel, including hospitalisation (for less than 48 hours) for observation only for a blow to the head or abdomen, or exposure to toxic substances.


The following are typical examples of diagnostic/preventive procedures that may also be classified as a first aid injury:


X-ray examination with a negative diagnosis (will be MTI if positive);

Physical examination, if no condition is identified or medical treatment is not administered; and

One time dose of prescribed medication, for example a tetanus Injection or pharmaceutical.


Medical Treatment Injuries


A medical treatment injury (MTI) is defined as an injury or disease that resulted in a certain level of treatment (not first aid treatment) given by a physician or other medical personnel under standing orders of a physician. Types of treatment that classify an injury under MTI are:


Use of prescription medication (schedule 4 or 8 ‘prescription only’ medication), except a single dose administered on a first visit for minor injury or discomfort;

Therapeutic (physiotherapy or chiropractic) treatment, more than once;

Stitches, sutures (including butterfly adhesive dressing in lieu of sutures);

Removal of dead tissue or skin (surgical debridement);

Treatment of infection;

Application of antiseptic during a second or subsequent visit to medical personnel;

Removal of foreign objects embedded in an eye;

Removal of foreign objects embedded in a wound (not small splinters);

Removal of embedded objects from an eye;

Treatment of deep tissue (second or third degree) burns;

Use of hot or cold soaking therapy or heat therapy during the second or subsequent visit to medical personnel;

Positive x-ray diagnosis of fractures, broken bones and etc; or

Admission to hospital or equivalent medical facility for treatment.


This article was originally posted on Workplace OHS a part of NSW Business Chamber – Australian Business Consulting and Solutions has a dedicated team of WHS/OHS experts who can assist you with your specific WHS/OHS issues and problems.

Contact Us

Zenergy News

Directors' duties for psych risks unpacked in new report
April 23, 2025
The WHS obligations of company directors include taking reasonable steps to understand the psychological hazards in their workplaces, and this is a "personal" prosecutable duty, a new guide for directors warns. Directors' obligations include establishing that their organisations and their management "are equipped with appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise these risks to the extent that is reasonably practicable", the guide by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and law firm King & Wood Mallesons says. Most of any organisation's work to address psychosocial hazards will be "driven by management", given the complexity of the risks and the deep operational knowledge required to guide action, it says. "The board plays a supporting role in constructively challenging these efforts and maintaining oversight of how effective psychosocial risk management contributes to broader organisational culture and leadership." Under Australia's national model WHS laws – adopted by all jurisdictions other than Victoria, which has similar legislation – officers have a duty to exercise due diligence to confirm their organisation is meeting its WHS obligations. (See section 27 of NSW's version of the laws, for example.) This duty is a "personal duty, meaning [officers] can be prosecuted for failing to meet their due diligence obligations", the guide says. "Prosecution typically requires proof that the officer failed to take reasonable steps to comply with their duty, assessed in the context of the organisation's overall safety and health management system," it says. These due diligence obligations apply to paid directors, and are "recommended" for volunteer directors, who can be prosecuted in limited circumstances. "While non-executive directors have not been the focus of WHS regulators to date, this can change, and regulatory expectations are rising," the guide notes. According to the 12-page document , company boards and governance play a crucial role in ensuring psychosocial risks are managed effectively. Directors must oversee management's efforts at identifying and implementing control measures, set expectations and confirm that the necessary frameworks are in place. "This includes seeking information, reviewing board reports, assessing organisational culture, and challenging management where needed to strengthen risk controls," the guide says. Examples of how boards should address the workplace factors that create psychosocial risks include: Overseeing how managers monitor the risks associated with work design by drawing on complaints data, employee surveys, and absence and turnover rates, and engaging regularly with management to assess risks and evaluate measures; Confirming that management is complying with the positive duty to eliminate workplace sexual harassment, and obtaining regular reports on key behavioural risks involving code of conduct breaches and harassment cases; Setting expectations for management to provide workers with practical assistance and timely consultation in the event of organisational change and restructures, which can create significant stress; Engaging with management to review how it is addressing remote work risks, and ensuring there they have a clear policy to guide them in determining when remote arrangements are appropriate; and Overseeing how HR and performance management processes are managed, and confirming that investigation procedures are fair, workers have access to appropriate support, and outcomes are handled as consistently as possible. Governing WHS Psychosocial Risks: A primer for directors, by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and King & Wood Mallesons, April 2025 This article has been reproduced with permission from OHS Alert, and the original version appears at www.ohsalert.com.au.
April 7, 2025
Zenergy recently hosted Women in Safety, a special networking event dedicated to fostering collaboration in the health, safety, and wellbeing sector. Held on March 20, 2025, at The Winery, Surry Hills, this event provided a relaxed and welcoming atmosphere where professionals gathered to exchange insights, share experiences, and build meaningful connections. With attendees from diverse industries—including construction, logistics, corporate sectors, and more—the event highlighted the vital role of women in shaping safer workplaces across Australia.
March 25, 2025
Podcasts have become a dominant force in the world of media, revolutionising how we consume information and entertainment and the WHS, Environment & Sustainability is no different! As the podcast industry continues to expand, listeners are discovering a wealth of benefits, from educational insights to fostering community connections. In this article, we share some of the leading podcasts and why they’ve become a growing part of modern WHS, Environment & Sustainability consumption. Here are some of the leading podcasts that every WHS, Environmental, and Sustainability professional should tune into:
March 24, 2025
Colin Hansen, WHS Director John Holland - M7M12 Project
March 3, 2025
Zenergy invites you to be part of the prestigious 2025 Australian Workplace Health & Safety Awards (AWHSA) —a national platform dedicated to recognising outstanding achievements in workplace health and safety. These awards celebrate individuals and organisations that are making a real impact in fostering safer, healthier work environments.
February 28, 2025
Australia has enacted mandatory sustainability reporting requirements, effective from 1 January 2025, through the Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Act 2024. These regulations mandate that large entities disclose climate-related financial information as part of their annual reporting obligations.
More Posts