Failure to warn of obvious risk: $725k payout

The NSW Supreme Court has awarded $725,000 in damages to a carpenter injured in a fall after his employer failed to instruct him about a safety hazard that it assumed was obvious to all workers.

The carpenter fractured his spine in a five-metre fall from a scaffolding rail.The incident occurred at the first time the worker had worked in the area of the building in question. The worker noted that his work had to be done at some pace and he was not told or taught to check every scaffold connection.


When he stood on a scaffolding rail to retrieve a tape measure that had dropped, the rail moved, causing him to lose his balance and fall.

Failure to take proper care


The court concluded that the employer was in breach of the duty that it owed the worker by failing to instruct him not to stand or climb upon scaffold rails. The worker had no need for a safety harness if he had been given that instruction and he had complied with it.

The court commented that the dangers that the workplace presented should have prompted either a complete prohibition upon working from an unsafe platform or the rectification of the defects before work commenced.


Contributory negligence


The court did not consider the worker’s lack of care for his own safety could be characterised as mere inadvertence. However, venturing beyond the safe confines of the scaffolding platform represented a departure from his obligation to take such care of himself.


The requirement for attention to his own safety in such circumstances must have been apparent.


The court assessed the worker’s negligent contribution to his injuries at 15 per cent.


The bottom line: An employer should not assume that obvious danger is obvious to everyone. Risks should be addressed with due diligence and relevant warnings provided.


S v Emicon Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1072 (12 August 2014)


This article was originally posted on Workplace OHS and has been published with permission.

Contact Us

Zenergy News

April 16, 2026
Explore how new 2026 WHS laws in NSW impact AI in the workplace, digital systems, employer obligations, and key compliance actions and expert insights from Zenergy.
April 14, 2026
Australia’s WHS job market in 2026 shows strong demand driven by infrastructure, mining, renewables and regulation, with contingent hiring dominating.
April 8, 2026
From December 2025, psychosocial hazards are a core WHS obligation in Australia. Learn what’s changed, what regulators expect, and how to prepare your organisation.
By March 24, 2026
Dr Emily Novatsis shares insights on leadership, risk management, safety culture, and transitioning from compliance to performance-driven safety in rail operations.
By Tom Desborough March 23, 2026
Discover key WHS insights from the AIHS NSW Safety Symposium 2026, including AI regulation, psychosocial safety trends, and future workforce impacts.
Psychosocial Regulation in Victoria: Is Your Safety Capability Ready?
By Jo Retallick March 2, 2026
Victoria’s new psychosocial health regulations are here. Learn why compliance isn’t enough and how HSE capability reduces mental injury risk.
More Posts

Our Offices

Sydney

25 Brisbane Street

Surry Hills NSW 2010


Melbourne

Level 23, Tower 5

Collins Square

727 Collins Street

Melbourne VIC 3008


Brisbane

Level 54

111 Eagle Street

Brisbane QLD 4000


Perth

108 St Georges Terrace

Perth WA 6000