WHS-style chain-of-responsibility provisions of the Heavy Vehicle National Law (HVNL) commenced on Monday 1st October 2018

The WHS-style chain-of-responsibility provisions of the Heavy Vehicle National Law (HVNL) commenced on Monday 1st October 2018, recognising that every party in the heavy vehicle transport supply chain has a duty to ensure safety. The reforms remove prescriptive obligations, providing greater flexibility for industry on how they achieve safety outcomes, it encourage parties in the chain to be proactive in managing risks, whilst also implementing nationally agreed changes, such as strengthening inspectors’ investigative and enforcement powers, increasing freight volumes where mass is not a constraint, transferring load restraint performance standards from guidance material to the HVNL, and reducing administrative and regulatory burdens.



The new laws also impose a positive duty of care on all parties that can influence road safety and requiring officers to exercise due diligence to ensure their companies comply with their duties. Executive officers may be held liable for any breaches committed by their company. These changes will also see an increase in penalties for individuals with corporate multipliers applying to corporations. (see change 7)

So, what are the major changes that have been enacted?

Change 1 – Vehicle standards (maintenance) has being included


In recognition of the fact that vehicle design, construction and roadworthiness play a key role in road safety, vehicle standards were added as a new CoR compliance component.


This means that all parties in the Chain will have some responsibility in relation to the roadworthiness of vehicles used in their supply chain.

Change 2 – The standard of legal duty has changed

Previously, a business could only be prosecuted where a breach of a CoR component has occurred. The previous test was whether a business took “all reasonable steps” to prevent that breach from occurring.



The new standard requires all parties in the Chain to take “all reasonably practicable steps to ensure the safety of their transport activities”. It is forward-looking, rather than incident-based. This means that businesses could be prosecuted for failing to put in place CoR control structures and practices, even if a CoR accident/incident has not occurred.

Change 3 – Executive liability is different


Previously, a member of the Executive could only be prosecuted where a breach of a CoR component is committed by their business. The previous test was whether an Executive exercised “reasonable diligence” to prevent that breach from occurring.



The new standard requires Executives of all parties in the Chain to exercise “due diligence” to ensure that their businesses comply with all duties under the CoR. It is forward-looking, rather than incident-based. This means that Executives could be prosecuted for failing to put in place CoR control structures and practices, even if a CoR accident/incident has not occurred.

Change 4 – New powers for authorised officers

Authorised officers now have increased powers to obtain documents and information as evidence of potential breaches, particularly from third party providers outside the supply chain.


The new duties mean that authorised officers do not need to link an investigation to an offence or roadside inspection; allowing for a much more proactive approach in addressing unsafe practices across the entire supply chain.

Change 5 – Your CoR management system will more closely align with your WHS management system

The changed standards of duty for businesses and their Executives brings them into line with the well-known tests under WHS law.



This means that many aspects of existing WHS management systems can be adapted as part of your CoR management. For example, existing WHS risk assessment, safe work procedures, training needs analyses, incident registers and compliance reporting frameworks can be equally applied or applied with a little adaption to CoR management.

Change 6 – Industry codes are coming

The new laws mandate that any registered industry codes must provide much greater compliance substance than those in the past, in order to be accepted for registration. The new generation of industry codes will be designed to identify the common CoR risks faced by an industry and canvas the available range of suitable control measures that could be adopted to respond to those risks, as well as giving individual industry participants guidance on how to conduct risk assessment and analysis tailored for their own individual business.

Change 7 – Penalties for breaches have increased

Penalties have increased to align with those under existing WHS laws and in order to ensure that businesses and their Executives give greater attention to CoR compliance management, the new penalties are as follows:

Offence Penalty
Category 1 offence – for a person who is reckless as to the risk. Individual – maximum $300,000 or 5 years imprisonment, or both. Corporation – maximum $3,000,000.
Category 2 offence – for exposure to risk of death or serious injury. Individual – maximum $150,000. Corporation – maximum $1,500,000.
Category 3 offence – for breaches of the safety duty. Individual – maximum $50,000. Corporation – maximum $500,000.

To learn more about how the legislation changes affect you and your company, and to identify any gaps you may have in meeting the new laws reach out to our Zenergy Consulting Practice today on 1300 333 400 or read up on some of the details on our CoR blog series located on our website.

Contact Us

Zenergy News

Directors' duties for psych risks unpacked in new report
April 23, 2025
The WHS obligations of company directors include taking reasonable steps to understand the psychological hazards in their workplaces, and this is a "personal" prosecutable duty, a new guide for directors warns. Directors' obligations include establishing that their organisations and their management "are equipped with appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise these risks to the extent that is reasonably practicable", the guide by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and law firm King & Wood Mallesons says. Most of any organisation's work to address psychosocial hazards will be "driven by management", given the complexity of the risks and the deep operational knowledge required to guide action, it says. "The board plays a supporting role in constructively challenging these efforts and maintaining oversight of how effective psychosocial risk management contributes to broader organisational culture and leadership." Under Australia's national model WHS laws – adopted by all jurisdictions other than Victoria, which has similar legislation – officers have a duty to exercise due diligence to confirm their organisation is meeting its WHS obligations. (See section 27 of NSW's version of the laws, for example.) This duty is a "personal duty, meaning [officers] can be prosecuted for failing to meet their due diligence obligations", the guide says. "Prosecution typically requires proof that the officer failed to take reasonable steps to comply with their duty, assessed in the context of the organisation's overall safety and health management system," it says. These due diligence obligations apply to paid directors, and are "recommended" for volunteer directors, who can be prosecuted in limited circumstances. "While non-executive directors have not been the focus of WHS regulators to date, this can change, and regulatory expectations are rising," the guide notes. According to the 12-page document , company boards and governance play a crucial role in ensuring psychosocial risks are managed effectively. Directors must oversee management's efforts at identifying and implementing control measures, set expectations and confirm that the necessary frameworks are in place. "This includes seeking information, reviewing board reports, assessing organisational culture, and challenging management where needed to strengthen risk controls," the guide says. Examples of how boards should address the workplace factors that create psychosocial risks include: Overseeing how managers monitor the risks associated with work design by drawing on complaints data, employee surveys, and absence and turnover rates, and engaging regularly with management to assess risks and evaluate measures; Confirming that management is complying with the positive duty to eliminate workplace sexual harassment, and obtaining regular reports on key behavioural risks involving code of conduct breaches and harassment cases; Setting expectations for management to provide workers with practical assistance and timely consultation in the event of organisational change and restructures, which can create significant stress; Engaging with management to review how it is addressing remote work risks, and ensuring there they have a clear policy to guide them in determining when remote arrangements are appropriate; and Overseeing how HR and performance management processes are managed, and confirming that investigation procedures are fair, workers have access to appropriate support, and outcomes are handled as consistently as possible. Governing WHS Psychosocial Risks: A primer for directors, by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and King & Wood Mallesons, April 2025 This article has been reproduced with permission from OHS Alert, and the original version appears at www.ohsalert.com.au.
April 7, 2025
Zenergy recently hosted Women in Safety, a special networking event dedicated to fostering collaboration in the health, safety, and wellbeing sector. Held on March 20, 2025, at The Winery, Surry Hills, this event provided a relaxed and welcoming atmosphere where professionals gathered to exchange insights, share experiences, and build meaningful connections. With attendees from diverse industries—including construction, logistics, corporate sectors, and more—the event highlighted the vital role of women in shaping safer workplaces across Australia.
March 25, 2025
Podcasts have become a dominant force in the world of media, revolutionising how we consume information and entertainment and the WHS, Environment & Sustainability is no different! As the podcast industry continues to expand, listeners are discovering a wealth of benefits, from educational insights to fostering community connections. In this article, we share some of the leading podcasts and why they’ve become a growing part of modern WHS, Environment & Sustainability consumption. Here are some of the leading podcasts that every WHS, Environmental, and Sustainability professional should tune into:
March 24, 2025
Colin Hansen, WHS Director John Holland - M7M12 Project
March 3, 2025
Zenergy invites you to be part of the prestigious 2025 Australian Workplace Health & Safety Awards (AWHSA) —a national platform dedicated to recognising outstanding achievements in workplace health and safety. These awards celebrate individuals and organisations that are making a real impact in fostering safer, healthier work environments.
February 28, 2025
Australia has enacted mandatory sustainability reporting requirements, effective from 1 January 2025, through the Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Act 2024. These regulations mandate that large entities disclose climate-related financial information as part of their annual reporting obligations.
More Posts