$330k fine over rig deaths, Handwashing Day, more

$330k fine over rig deaths, Handwashing Day, more

Stena Clyde Drilling has been sentenced over the deaths of two offshore rig workers. Meanwhile, today has been declared National Handwashing Day, and the importance of ensuring safety at workplaces where vehicles and people interact has been highlighted.

Stena fined $330k over rig deaths


The operator of the Stena Clyde mobile offshore drilling rig, where there was a double fatality three years ago, was convicted and fined $330,000 by the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria yesterday, having pleaded guilty to the incident last week.


Stena Drilling Australia Pty Ltd conceded failing to implement and maintain systems of work that were safe and without risk to health as required under clause 9(2)(d) of the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006 (OPGGS Act).


The incident occurred during drilling operations in Commonwealth waters in the Bass Strait on 27 August 2012. It resulted in the deaths of floorman Peter Meddens and toolpusher Barry Denholm.


The investigation by NOPSEMA – the offshore petroleum safety regulator – identified that senior management failed to carry out a new risk assessment and toolbox talk after altering the original plan of works.


Further, the organisation conceded that senior members of the drilling crew failed to ensure a revised risk assessment had been performed prior to implementing the new plan.


When sentencing the organisation, the magistrate said that while it had systems in place, “their implementation on the day that gives rise to the charge. Scrupulous adherence to systems is essential. The consequence of any negligence is profound”.



In addition, the magistrate said: “General deterrence is required, sending a message to others in the industry”.

Today is National Handwashing Day – useful poster


To raise awareness of the importance of hand hygiene in germ prevention, today (Sept 4) has been declared National Handwashing Day – and workers have been encouraged to participate.


The campaign is an initiative of child rights organisation Plan International Australia, whose CEO, Ian Wishart, warned that Australians who don’t wash their hands properly (after using a toilet, for instance) run the risk of spreading not only common but nasty viruses (e.g. gastroenteritis, flu and common colds) but also potentially deadly diseases (e.g. diarrhoea, pneumonia, Ebola).


He also warned that many Australian believed quickly rinsing their fingers under a tap without the use of soap was sufficient – but they were wrong.


When properly performed, Wishart said handwashing was the “single most cost-effective health intervention”. He identified seven simple steps involved in effective handwashing:


Wet hands, apply soap and rub palms together until soap is bubbly

Rub the back of both your hands

Interlace fingers and rub hands together

Rub fingertips in palm of both hands

Make a fist and rub your knuckles into your palms, and repeat with the other hand

Rub each finger individually

Rub both wrists in a rotating manner and rinse off the soap.


“It might sound complicated but…it’s pretty simple and takes only a few seconds longer than running your hands under the tap,” Wishart said.


“But for that few seconds more, you’re going a long way to guard yourself from a variety of viruses, germs and bacteria.”


He encouraged employees to download and print out Plan’s mini poster demonstrating the correct handwashing technique and place it near where their co-workers wash their hands.

Reminder about dangers when vehicles and workers interact


SaWorkSafe WA has reminded businesses to ensure safe systems of work at workplaces where vehicles and pedestrians interact.

The reminder was prompted by a string of recent incidents involving people being injured or killed by vehicles or parts of vehicles such as ramps.

WorkSafe WA director Joe Attard said it was evident that insufficient attention was being paid to this issue, which requires strict rules to be in place to ensure a safe work environment.

Some examples of recent serious and fatal incidents involving vehicles and people are:

A bystander was killed when an operator was manoeuvring a truck in a loading dock. While moving forward, the rear of the truck swung out and crushed the bystander against a wall.

Two people – a bystander and a truck driver – were killed in separate incidents when the hydraulic ramps of low loader trailers fell on them.

A person was hit by the rear of a trailer and crushed by the wheels when a truck was moving slowly around a corner at a workplace.

In several incidents, people suffered serious or fatal injuries while forklifts or cranes were being used to unload vehicles. These people were standing too close to the raised load and were crushed when the load, or part of it, fell.

Several serious injuries were suffered when drivers turned on the ignition while not sitting in the driver’s seat. Vehicles that were in gear moved suddenly and caused injuries.

A front end loader at a workplace reversed and crushed a bystander against a parked vehicle, causing serious injuries.

A member of the public was killed when an earthmoving machine reversed over him. The vehicle was landscaping in a garden bed next to a park where there was no spotter or exclusion zones for pedestrians.

Attard said that while these incidents involved a number of contributing factors, the ‘bottom line’ was a lack of management of the movement and speed of vehicles and a lack of segregation of pedestrians and vehicles.

“I urge employers to ensure the movement and speed of vehicles is managed to minimise the risk of injury and that workplaces are designed and maintained to ensure the safety of operators and others,” he said.

“In addition, safe systems of work, communication systems and signage need to be in place, and everyone at the workplace needs to be adequately trained in these safe systems.

“Lastly, operators and others should not be permitted to work in the fall zone of ramps or underneath vehicles or mobile plant that is not adequately supported.

WorkSafe WA has published a guidance note on safe movement of vehicles at workplaces.



By James Harkness


This article was originally posted on Workplace OHS a part of NSW Business Chamber – Australian Business Consulting and Solutions has a dedicated team of WHS/OHS experts who can assist you with your specific WHS/OHS issues and problems.

Contact Us

Zenergy News

Directors' duties for psych risks unpacked in new report
April 23, 2025
The WHS obligations of company directors include taking reasonable steps to understand the psychological hazards in their workplaces, and this is a "personal" prosecutable duty, a new guide for directors warns. Directors' obligations include establishing that their organisations and their management "are equipped with appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise these risks to the extent that is reasonably practicable", the guide by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and law firm King & Wood Mallesons says. Most of any organisation's work to address psychosocial hazards will be "driven by management", given the complexity of the risks and the deep operational knowledge required to guide action, it says. "The board plays a supporting role in constructively challenging these efforts and maintaining oversight of how effective psychosocial risk management contributes to broader organisational culture and leadership." Under Australia's national model WHS laws – adopted by all jurisdictions other than Victoria, which has similar legislation – officers have a duty to exercise due diligence to confirm their organisation is meeting its WHS obligations. (See section 27 of NSW's version of the laws, for example.) This duty is a "personal duty, meaning [officers] can be prosecuted for failing to meet their due diligence obligations", the guide says. "Prosecution typically requires proof that the officer failed to take reasonable steps to comply with their duty, assessed in the context of the organisation's overall safety and health management system," it says. These due diligence obligations apply to paid directors, and are "recommended" for volunteer directors, who can be prosecuted in limited circumstances. "While non-executive directors have not been the focus of WHS regulators to date, this can change, and regulatory expectations are rising," the guide notes. According to the 12-page document , company boards and governance play a crucial role in ensuring psychosocial risks are managed effectively. Directors must oversee management's efforts at identifying and implementing control measures, set expectations and confirm that the necessary frameworks are in place. "This includes seeking information, reviewing board reports, assessing organisational culture, and challenging management where needed to strengthen risk controls," the guide says. Examples of how boards should address the workplace factors that create psychosocial risks include: Overseeing how managers monitor the risks associated with work design by drawing on complaints data, employee surveys, and absence and turnover rates, and engaging regularly with management to assess risks and evaluate measures; Confirming that management is complying with the positive duty to eliminate workplace sexual harassment, and obtaining regular reports on key behavioural risks involving code of conduct breaches and harassment cases; Setting expectations for management to provide workers with practical assistance and timely consultation in the event of organisational change and restructures, which can create significant stress; Engaging with management to review how it is addressing remote work risks, and ensuring there they have a clear policy to guide them in determining when remote arrangements are appropriate; and Overseeing how HR and performance management processes are managed, and confirming that investigation procedures are fair, workers have access to appropriate support, and outcomes are handled as consistently as possible. Governing WHS Psychosocial Risks: A primer for directors, by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and King & Wood Mallesons, April 2025 This article has been reproduced with permission from OHS Alert, and the original version appears at www.ohsalert.com.au.
April 7, 2025
Zenergy recently hosted Women in Safety, a special networking event dedicated to fostering collaboration in the health, safety, and wellbeing sector. Held on March 20, 2025, at The Winery, Surry Hills, this event provided a relaxed and welcoming atmosphere where professionals gathered to exchange insights, share experiences, and build meaningful connections. With attendees from diverse industries—including construction, logistics, corporate sectors, and more—the event highlighted the vital role of women in shaping safer workplaces across Australia.
March 25, 2025
Podcasts have become a dominant force in the world of media, revolutionising how we consume information and entertainment and the WHS, Environment & Sustainability is no different! As the podcast industry continues to expand, listeners are discovering a wealth of benefits, from educational insights to fostering community connections. In this article, we share some of the leading podcasts and why they’ve become a growing part of modern WHS, Environment & Sustainability consumption. Here are some of the leading podcasts that every WHS, Environmental, and Sustainability professional should tune into:
March 24, 2025
Colin Hansen, WHS Director John Holland - M7M12 Project
March 3, 2025
Zenergy invites you to be part of the prestigious 2025 Australian Workplace Health & Safety Awards (AWHSA) —a national platform dedicated to recognising outstanding achievements in workplace health and safety. These awards celebrate individuals and organisations that are making a real impact in fostering safer, healthier work environments.
February 28, 2025
Australia has enacted mandatory sustainability reporting requirements, effective from 1 January 2025, through the Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Act 2024. These regulations mandate that large entities disclose climate-related financial information as part of their annual reporting obligations.
More Posts