‘Safe’ employers to save $200m in premiums in NSW

High-performing medium to large employers in NSW will collectively save $200 million in workers compensation premiums this year, the state government has announced.


Minister for Finance Dominic Perrottet said medium to large employers with good safety records would be rewarded with a reduction due to calculations, incentives and discounts under the state’s new premium incentive regime, while other businesses would pay premiums that reflect their true cost to the scheme.


“Today around 80 per cent of scheme costs are generated by the below average safety records of about a quarter of businesses, who pay about the same in premiums as other safe businesses,” the minister said.


“Under the new regime, businesses that keep their workers safe and help those that are injured return to work will only have to contribute about a third of total premiums – saving them collectively $200 million.


“The new regime will free up real money allowing NSW businesses who do the right thing by their workers to grow and invest in people and capital.”

Two-year cap on premiums


Vivek Bhatia, CEO of the state’s workers comp nominal insurer, icare, said a two year grace period would be extended to help businesses with higher than average claims improve their safety records. Annual premiums will be capped at 30 per cent above the average for the two-year period.


“We understand that circumstances are unique for every business and icare is open to talking directly to employers about their issues and working with them to help identify and fix the causes,” he said.



“After two years there will be no cap and these businesses will wear the true cost.

Call for additional support for businesses


According to the NSW Business Chamber, the government’s announcement shows it is on the right track in creating a fairer workers’ compensation system. However, the chamber’s CEO, Stephen Cartwright raised some concerns.



“The new premium calculation takes into account safety performance over the past three years, rather than two years as in the previous system, therefore there is a real risk that businesses that had previously thought their safety performance was satisfactory will experience significantly increased premiums,” he said.


“While the government has capped premium increases by 30 per cent for the next two years to ease the transition, the unexpected cost imposed on businesses is of real concern.


“Given the current economic climate, we would expect that the government’s commitment to providing additional support to impacted businesses through icare would extend to moderating short term cost increases as well strategic initiatives to improve safety performance in the long-term.”

“Built on the backs of the sick and injured”


Unions NSW assistant secretary Emma Maiden said it was inappropriate for businesses to benefit from any workers compensation surplus at the expense of injured workers.


“This further reduction in premiums for business is built on the backs of sick and injured workers. While we have no problem with a carrot and stick approach to encouraging safe work practices and good return to work practices we think premiums should not be reduced further given the huge cuts since 2012.

“Unions believe the best way forward is to increase premiums for employers that are doing the wrong thing and use all additional funds to support injured workers.”


Maiden said injured workers were being penalised 14.5% from the moment they were injured because of an immediate 5% cut in their wages and a cessation of superannuation payments from the employer.

“Now the scheme is back in the black, the government should look urgently at further reversing some of the severe cuts to the system that has treated injured workers and their families so callously. The government could ensure medical bills are paid for the duration of an injury and also increase payments if workers’ injuries deteriorate.


“If the government was fair minded it would look to helping the injured instead of putting more dollars into the hands of business. Given employers have already received premium cuts of up to 17.5% we call on the Baird Government to allocate any surplus back to injured workers. Let the scheme do what it was set up to do in the first place, provide much needed assistance to injured workers in their time of need,” Ms Maiden said.



By James Harkness


This article was originally posted on Workplace OHS a part of NSW Business Chamber – Australian Business Consulting and Solutions has a dedicated team of WHS/OHS experts who can assist you with your specific WHS/OHS issues and problems.

Contact Us

Zenergy News

Directors' duties for psych risks unpacked in new report
April 23, 2025
The WHS obligations of company directors include taking reasonable steps to understand the psychological hazards in their workplaces, and this is a "personal" prosecutable duty, a new guide for directors warns. Directors' obligations include establishing that their organisations and their management "are equipped with appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise these risks to the extent that is reasonably practicable", the guide by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and law firm King & Wood Mallesons says. Most of any organisation's work to address psychosocial hazards will be "driven by management", given the complexity of the risks and the deep operational knowledge required to guide action, it says. "The board plays a supporting role in constructively challenging these efforts and maintaining oversight of how effective psychosocial risk management contributes to broader organisational culture and leadership." Under Australia's national model WHS laws – adopted by all jurisdictions other than Victoria, which has similar legislation – officers have a duty to exercise due diligence to confirm their organisation is meeting its WHS obligations. (See section 27 of NSW's version of the laws, for example.) This duty is a "personal duty, meaning [officers] can be prosecuted for failing to meet their due diligence obligations", the guide says. "Prosecution typically requires proof that the officer failed to take reasonable steps to comply with their duty, assessed in the context of the organisation's overall safety and health management system," it says. These due diligence obligations apply to paid directors, and are "recommended" for volunteer directors, who can be prosecuted in limited circumstances. "While non-executive directors have not been the focus of WHS regulators to date, this can change, and regulatory expectations are rising," the guide notes. According to the 12-page document , company boards and governance play a crucial role in ensuring psychosocial risks are managed effectively. Directors must oversee management's efforts at identifying and implementing control measures, set expectations and confirm that the necessary frameworks are in place. "This includes seeking information, reviewing board reports, assessing organisational culture, and challenging management where needed to strengthen risk controls," the guide says. Examples of how boards should address the workplace factors that create psychosocial risks include: Overseeing how managers monitor the risks associated with work design by drawing on complaints data, employee surveys, and absence and turnover rates, and engaging regularly with management to assess risks and evaluate measures; Confirming that management is complying with the positive duty to eliminate workplace sexual harassment, and obtaining regular reports on key behavioural risks involving code of conduct breaches and harassment cases; Setting expectations for management to provide workers with practical assistance and timely consultation in the event of organisational change and restructures, which can create significant stress; Engaging with management to review how it is addressing remote work risks, and ensuring there they have a clear policy to guide them in determining when remote arrangements are appropriate; and Overseeing how HR and performance management processes are managed, and confirming that investigation procedures are fair, workers have access to appropriate support, and outcomes are handled as consistently as possible. Governing WHS Psychosocial Risks: A primer for directors, by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and King & Wood Mallesons, April 2025 This article has been reproduced with permission from OHS Alert, and the original version appears at www.ohsalert.com.au.
April 7, 2025
Zenergy recently hosted Women in Safety, a special networking event dedicated to fostering collaboration in the health, safety, and wellbeing sector. Held on March 20, 2025, at The Winery, Surry Hills, this event provided a relaxed and welcoming atmosphere where professionals gathered to exchange insights, share experiences, and build meaningful connections. With attendees from diverse industries—including construction, logistics, corporate sectors, and more—the event highlighted the vital role of women in shaping safer workplaces across Australia.
March 25, 2025
Podcasts have become a dominant force in the world of media, revolutionising how we consume information and entertainment and the WHS, Environment & Sustainability is no different! As the podcast industry continues to expand, listeners are discovering a wealth of benefits, from educational insights to fostering community connections. In this article, we share some of the leading podcasts and why they’ve become a growing part of modern WHS, Environment & Sustainability consumption. Here are some of the leading podcasts that every WHS, Environmental, and Sustainability professional should tune into:
March 24, 2025
Colin Hansen, WHS Director John Holland - M7M12 Project
March 3, 2025
Zenergy invites you to be part of the prestigious 2025 Australian Workplace Health & Safety Awards (AWHSA) —a national platform dedicated to recognising outstanding achievements in workplace health and safety. These awards celebrate individuals and organisations that are making a real impact in fostering safer, healthier work environments.
February 28, 2025
Australia has enacted mandatory sustainability reporting requirements, effective from 1 January 2025, through the Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Act 2024. These regulations mandate that large entities disclose climate-related financial information as part of their annual reporting obligations.
More Posts