How Laing O’Rourke is taking Safety to the NextGear – a discussion with Zenergy

With many Australia companies pushing traditional health safety methodology beyond its capability – I sat down with Tim Fleming where he explained how Laing O’Rourke developed ‘NextGear’ to comprehensively empower workers and deliver safer environments.


Having seen the evolution of safety strategies over the past 10 years, I have been fortunate to speak to many thought leaders that have been restless in their approach to continual improvement. No one will deny that work, health and safety is a work in progress but thanks to the efforts of many of its practitioners, it is constantly evolving.


One such example is the leadership team at Laing O’Rourke and General Manager HSE Tim Fleming. They set about finding ways to not only add value but to also deliver better working environments that empower building and construction employees.


“We weren’t satisfied that the traditional zero harm focus was offering our organisation everything we needed for the future and we were restless about what more we could do,” Tim pointed out.


“At Laing O’Rourke we are committed to challenging and changing the way the construction industry goes to work everyday.”

New Paragraph

So how has Laing O’Rourke’s Next Gear initiative approached this massive undertaking?


Defining success

One of the major issues with the traditional paradigm is the reactionary approach to work, health and safety that relies on metrics and numbers to define success. Simply applying penalties and audits after an accident or due to failure is not a sustainable approach.

So how has Laing O’Rourke’s Next Gear initiative approached this massive undertaking?

Beginning with the idea that zero harm, while it had served a major purpose at Laing O’Rourke in improving safety performance, it no longer offered our organisation a sustainable work, health and safety strategy, the leadership team picked up the idea of adding value to the organisation through a comprehensive rewrite of company policy.


“We understood we could no longer continue to describe our safety performance in terms of numbers and only measure what went wrong – and the idea that achieving a zero statistic meant that we had a safe workplace.


We wanted to change the perception, and in some cases, the reality of safety away from paperwork bureaucracy, and blame,” said Mr Fleming.

In response, Next Gear was developed to disrupt the traditional delivery of safety while contributing to the overall success of an organisatio

n.

To achieve success, the team at Laing O’Rourke outlined that while the end result was important, it is the journey that really counts. This means developing an organisational culture that is one part resilience and another part empowerment.

“We see success as building resilience in the company by understanding the conditions that create a culture of engagement and trust – not just a system of compliance and control.”


Next Gear offers an alternative approach that engages people and looks to individuals to effect success.


” What we want to achieve is an environment where we no longer seek blame but look at the individual as someone who will provide the solution.”



To achieve this, Mr Fleming and others within the leadership team have developed mechanisms, forums and processes that ask and encourage workers to contribute to the overall safety of an organisation.

Managing relationships

One of the major challenges that Tim and the management team of Laing O’Rourke faced was how to bring external stakeholders, suppliers and partners on the same journey.


“Working and engaging with these key stakeholders including our clients and our key supply chain partners has been absolutely critical to our approach of approaching safety differently.


“We’re now in a position where some clients are calling us in to ask us how they might deliver a step-change approach in their own fields. We don’t have all the answers, but we’re happy to play our part for the industry.”


For those at Laing O’Rourke, and Tim Fleming especially, redefining what success looks like has driven safety to the Next Gear. From empowering workers to creating a culture of resilience, the journey towards success has been as fruitful as the end result will be.

Contact Us

Zenergy News

Directors' duties for psych risks unpacked in new report
April 23, 2025
The WHS obligations of company directors include taking reasonable steps to understand the psychological hazards in their workplaces, and this is a "personal" prosecutable duty, a new guide for directors warns. Directors' obligations include establishing that their organisations and their management "are equipped with appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise these risks to the extent that is reasonably practicable", the guide by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and law firm King & Wood Mallesons says. Most of any organisation's work to address psychosocial hazards will be "driven by management", given the complexity of the risks and the deep operational knowledge required to guide action, it says. "The board plays a supporting role in constructively challenging these efforts and maintaining oversight of how effective psychosocial risk management contributes to broader organisational culture and leadership." Under Australia's national model WHS laws – adopted by all jurisdictions other than Victoria, which has similar legislation – officers have a duty to exercise due diligence to confirm their organisation is meeting its WHS obligations. (See section 27 of NSW's version of the laws, for example.) This duty is a "personal duty, meaning [officers] can be prosecuted for failing to meet their due diligence obligations", the guide says. "Prosecution typically requires proof that the officer failed to take reasonable steps to comply with their duty, assessed in the context of the organisation's overall safety and health management system," it says. These due diligence obligations apply to paid directors, and are "recommended" for volunteer directors, who can be prosecuted in limited circumstances. "While non-executive directors have not been the focus of WHS regulators to date, this can change, and regulatory expectations are rising," the guide notes. According to the 12-page document , company boards and governance play a crucial role in ensuring psychosocial risks are managed effectively. Directors must oversee management's efforts at identifying and implementing control measures, set expectations and confirm that the necessary frameworks are in place. "This includes seeking information, reviewing board reports, assessing organisational culture, and challenging management where needed to strengthen risk controls," the guide says. Examples of how boards should address the workplace factors that create psychosocial risks include: Overseeing how managers monitor the risks associated with work design by drawing on complaints data, employee surveys, and absence and turnover rates, and engaging regularly with management to assess risks and evaluate measures; Confirming that management is complying with the positive duty to eliminate workplace sexual harassment, and obtaining regular reports on key behavioural risks involving code of conduct breaches and harassment cases; Setting expectations for management to provide workers with practical assistance and timely consultation in the event of organisational change and restructures, which can create significant stress; Engaging with management to review how it is addressing remote work risks, and ensuring there they have a clear policy to guide them in determining when remote arrangements are appropriate; and Overseeing how HR and performance management processes are managed, and confirming that investigation procedures are fair, workers have access to appropriate support, and outcomes are handled as consistently as possible. Governing WHS Psychosocial Risks: A primer for directors, by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and King & Wood Mallesons, April 2025 This article has been reproduced with permission from OHS Alert, and the original version appears at www.ohsalert.com.au.
April 7, 2025
Zenergy recently hosted Women in Safety, a special networking event dedicated to fostering collaboration in the health, safety, and wellbeing sector. Held on March 20, 2025, at The Winery, Surry Hills, this event provided a relaxed and welcoming atmosphere where professionals gathered to exchange insights, share experiences, and build meaningful connections. With attendees from diverse industries—including construction, logistics, corporate sectors, and more—the event highlighted the vital role of women in shaping safer workplaces across Australia.
March 25, 2025
Podcasts have become a dominant force in the world of media, revolutionising how we consume information and entertainment and the WHS, Environment & Sustainability is no different! As the podcast industry continues to expand, listeners are discovering a wealth of benefits, from educational insights to fostering community connections. In this article, we share some of the leading podcasts and why they’ve become a growing part of modern WHS, Environment & Sustainability consumption. Here are some of the leading podcasts that every WHS, Environmental, and Sustainability professional should tune into:
March 24, 2025
Colin Hansen, WHS Director John Holland - M7M12 Project
March 3, 2025
Zenergy invites you to be part of the prestigious 2025 Australian Workplace Health & Safety Awards (AWHSA) —a national platform dedicated to recognising outstanding achievements in workplace health and safety. These awards celebrate individuals and organisations that are making a real impact in fostering safer, healthier work environments.
February 28, 2025
Australia has enacted mandatory sustainability reporting requirements, effective from 1 January 2025, through the Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Act 2024. These regulations mandate that large entities disclose climate-related financial information as part of their annual reporting obligations.
More Posts