Fall from truck while loading – $300,000 fine

Case Update

A business supplying the construction industry with timber frames and trusses has been fined $300,000 after a truck driver was seriously injured when he fell off the truck onto concrete, broke his neck and suffered a traumatic brain injury.

The incident


The 65-year-old driver had been working with the company for about six years. His main duties included driving an articulated vehicle, and loading and unloading frames and trusses.


On the day of the incident in July 2017, he was operating an articulated vehicle consisting of a prime mover with flatbed trailer attached to it. He had driven the truck to a workplace where two packs of floor sheets were loaded on the front of the trailer bed of the truck and two timber frames and truss ‘frame packs’ were loaded behind the floor sheets across the full width of the trailer. The load was secured.


He then drove the truck to another worksite (‘Balook Drive’) and parked it in preparation for the trailer to be loaded by forklift with two packs of steel joists and a bundle of timber.


After talking with the forklift operator about where the steel joists were to be positioned, the driver climbed onto the trailer and stood in the space between the loaded frames and the rear end of the trailer to observe the loading operation and to direct the positioning of the joist packs.


The first load of steel joists was successfully loaded onto the trailer using a ‘shunt forward’ method, then a pack of steel joists rolled off the forklift tynes and landed at an angle on top of the first load of joists.


The truck driver was concerned the joists would fall off the truck on the driver’s side and had moved towards that side to alert any pedestrians, when he fell from the truck trailer to the concrete surface at the back of the trailer.


His injuries included a fractured vertebra in his neck, a traumatic brain injury, a winged left scapula and partial tears in his rotator cuff. He was subsequently diagnosed with central cord syndrome and has nerve damage from the spinal cord injury. He has not returned to work.


Following the investigation by SafeWork NSW, the company was charged with breach of s32 of the Work Health and Safety Act – failure to comply with a health and safety duty and exposing a person to a risk of serious injury or death, which carries a maximum penalty of $1.5 million.

In court


The case was heard in the District Court of NSW.


The court heard that a risk assessment had not been carried out for the Balook Drive worksite, where the ground was uneven and sloping and there was limited area to allow for movement of multiple trucks and pedestrian exclusion zones for loading. The established practice for loading trucks at that worksite did not include a pedestrian exclusion zone around the truck or a specified safety zone for the driver.


The company did not clearly prohibit drivers from climbing onto the vehicle tray or trailer while it was being loaded or unloaded, and there was no system in place to ensure that the lashing of loads be conducted from ground level or from a mobile work platform.


Other evidence considered by the court included the legal requirements for preventing falls, available guidance material for the road freight transport industry, and the extensive and costly improvements the company made to its systems of work following the incident.


A mitigating factor was the managing director’s remorse and regret for the incident, but the judge also took into account an aggravating factor, namely that this was not the company’s first WHS offence – in 2011, another worker had fallen from a truck, and died from his injuries.


The company was convicted and fined $300,000 after a reduction of 25% to reflect an early guilty plea, plus costs of $27,500.

The bottom line: Safe systems of work including traffic management plans are vital for preventing accidents during the loading and unloading of trucks.

Read the judgment


Contact Us

Zenergy News

Directors' duties for psych risks unpacked in new report
April 23, 2025
The WHS obligations of company directors include taking reasonable steps to understand the psychological hazards in their workplaces, and this is a "personal" prosecutable duty, a new guide for directors warns. Directors' obligations include establishing that their organisations and their management "are equipped with appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise these risks to the extent that is reasonably practicable", the guide by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and law firm King & Wood Mallesons says. Most of any organisation's work to address psychosocial hazards will be "driven by management", given the complexity of the risks and the deep operational knowledge required to guide action, it says. "The board plays a supporting role in constructively challenging these efforts and maintaining oversight of how effective psychosocial risk management contributes to broader organisational culture and leadership." Under Australia's national model WHS laws – adopted by all jurisdictions other than Victoria, which has similar legislation – officers have a duty to exercise due diligence to confirm their organisation is meeting its WHS obligations. (See section 27 of NSW's version of the laws, for example.) This duty is a "personal duty, meaning [officers] can be prosecuted for failing to meet their due diligence obligations", the guide says. "Prosecution typically requires proof that the officer failed to take reasonable steps to comply with their duty, assessed in the context of the organisation's overall safety and health management system," it says. These due diligence obligations apply to paid directors, and are "recommended" for volunteer directors, who can be prosecuted in limited circumstances. "While non-executive directors have not been the focus of WHS regulators to date, this can change, and regulatory expectations are rising," the guide notes. According to the 12-page document , company boards and governance play a crucial role in ensuring psychosocial risks are managed effectively. Directors must oversee management's efforts at identifying and implementing control measures, set expectations and confirm that the necessary frameworks are in place. "This includes seeking information, reviewing board reports, assessing organisational culture, and challenging management where needed to strengthen risk controls," the guide says. Examples of how boards should address the workplace factors that create psychosocial risks include: Overseeing how managers monitor the risks associated with work design by drawing on complaints data, employee surveys, and absence and turnover rates, and engaging regularly with management to assess risks and evaluate measures; Confirming that management is complying with the positive duty to eliminate workplace sexual harassment, and obtaining regular reports on key behavioural risks involving code of conduct breaches and harassment cases; Setting expectations for management to provide workers with practical assistance and timely consultation in the event of organisational change and restructures, which can create significant stress; Engaging with management to review how it is addressing remote work risks, and ensuring there they have a clear policy to guide them in determining when remote arrangements are appropriate; and Overseeing how HR and performance management processes are managed, and confirming that investigation procedures are fair, workers have access to appropriate support, and outcomes are handled as consistently as possible. Governing WHS Psychosocial Risks: A primer for directors, by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and King & Wood Mallesons, April 2025 This article has been reproduced with permission from OHS Alert, and the original version appears at www.ohsalert.com.au.
April 7, 2025
Zenergy recently hosted Women in Safety, a special networking event dedicated to fostering collaboration in the health, safety, and wellbeing sector. Held on March 20, 2025, at The Winery, Surry Hills, this event provided a relaxed and welcoming atmosphere where professionals gathered to exchange insights, share experiences, and build meaningful connections. With attendees from diverse industries—including construction, logistics, corporate sectors, and more—the event highlighted the vital role of women in shaping safer workplaces across Australia.
March 25, 2025
Podcasts have become a dominant force in the world of media, revolutionising how we consume information and entertainment and the WHS, Environment & Sustainability is no different! As the podcast industry continues to expand, listeners are discovering a wealth of benefits, from educational insights to fostering community connections. In this article, we share some of the leading podcasts and why they’ve become a growing part of modern WHS, Environment & Sustainability consumption. Here are some of the leading podcasts that every WHS, Environmental, and Sustainability professional should tune into:
March 24, 2025
Colin Hansen, WHS Director John Holland - M7M12 Project
March 3, 2025
Zenergy invites you to be part of the prestigious 2025 Australian Workplace Health & Safety Awards (AWHSA) —a national platform dedicated to recognising outstanding achievements in workplace health and safety. These awards celebrate individuals and organisations that are making a real impact in fostering safer, healthier work environments.
February 28, 2025
Australia has enacted mandatory sustainability reporting requirements, effective from 1 January 2025, through the Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Act 2024. These regulations mandate that large entities disclose climate-related financial information as part of their annual reporting obligations.
More Posts