Workplace manslaughter case contributes to $13.3m haul, as new fatality charges laid

A workplace health and safety regulator has explained what the "safest workplaces" look like, in revealing it finalised more than 100 successful safety prosecutions in 2024.

WorkSafe Victoria today said that across 109 prosecutions and 10 accepted enforceable undertakings, duty holders were required to pay a total of $13,318,433 in fines, costs and enforceable safety initiatives.


This was well down on the $16,182,657 worth of safety penalties imposed in the State in 2023, with the difference explained by the higher number of completed successful prosecutions in 2023 (153) and the fact that three companies were handed particularly hefty fines of $2.9 million, $2.1 million and $1.5 million in that year (see related article).

 

In 2024, the highest fine imposed under the Victorian Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 was $1.3 million, handed to LH Holding Management Pty Ltd in the State's first workplace manslaughter conviction (see related article).

 

That case involved the death of a worker who was crushed by a forklift that tipped over because LH Holding's director was operating the vehicle unsafely on a sloping driveway.


Other large fines imposed in the State last year included:

 

  • $750,000, which went to Cutri Fruit Pty Ltd after a worker riding on machinery that wasn't designed to carry people fell and sustained fatal injuries (see related article);
  • $650,000, handed to Saferoads Pty Ltd after a 925-kilogram iron barrier fell on and killed a delivery driver during an unloading task (see related article); and
  • $545,000, which was handed to A&J Australia Pty Ltd for 16 breaches, including fire safety failures that led to staff using a flammable liquid and cardboard instead of a fire extinguisher to put out a fire on a machine and on two workers (see related article).

 

WorkSafe said the largest proportion of health and safety and dangerous goods prosecutions were against employers in the construction (49), manufacturing (26) and transport, postal and warehousing (10) industries.


Seventeen prosecutions were for unsafe machinery, 14 involved the risk of being crushed by or between objects, and 10 pertained to powered mobile plant like forklifts, it said.

 

Five employers were prosecuted for matters relating to occupational violence, bullying or harassment.

 

WorkSafe health and safety executive director Sam Jenkin noted his organisation's inspectors and investigators focus on industries and workplaces where workers are most at risk.

 

He warned that employers that "turn a blind eye to health and safety risks in their workplace play a deadly game that can lead to horrific injuries or loss of life, as well as costly legal consequences".

 

Importantly, Jenkin stressed that the "safest workplaces are those where employers proactively engage with workers and health and safety representatives, where available, to identify and address health and safety risks by making safety a priority for everyone".

 

"Duty holders need to have systems and processes in place to identify, assess and respond to work-related hazards to their physical or mental health, including the risk of violence and hazards such as bullying or harassment," he added.

 

In another development today, WorkSafe announced it had charged Lemitech Pty Ltd – a Lethbridge poultry farm operator – over the March 2023 death of a worker.

 

The 34-year-old man was working next to a conveyor belt with the guard removed, at the farm, when he became entangled in the rotating components of the tail pulley and suffered fatal crush injuries.

 

WorkSafe alleged Lemitech committed three breaches of section 26 ("Duties of persons who manage or control workplaces") of the OHS Act in failing to reduce the risk of serious injury or death by not: installing a fixed guard with a viewing window and other safety mechanisms on the tail pulley; installing a fixed guard on a nip point near the tail pulley; or implementing a lock-out-tag-out procedure to prevent the conveyor from operating during maintenance work.

 

The matter is listed for a filing hearing in the Geelong Magistrates Court on 11 February.

 

“This article originally appeared on OHS Alert and is reproduced with permission” 




Contact Us

Zenergy News

Directors' duties for psych risks unpacked in new report
April 23, 2025
The WHS obligations of company directors include taking reasonable steps to understand the psychological hazards in their workplaces, and this is a "personal" prosecutable duty, a new guide for directors warns. Directors' obligations include establishing that their organisations and their management "are equipped with appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise these risks to the extent that is reasonably practicable", the guide by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and law firm King & Wood Mallesons says. Most of any organisation's work to address psychosocial hazards will be "driven by management", given the complexity of the risks and the deep operational knowledge required to guide action, it says. "The board plays a supporting role in constructively challenging these efforts and maintaining oversight of how effective psychosocial risk management contributes to broader organisational culture and leadership." Under Australia's national model WHS laws – adopted by all jurisdictions other than Victoria, which has similar legislation – officers have a duty to exercise due diligence to confirm their organisation is meeting its WHS obligations. (See section 27 of NSW's version of the laws, for example.) This duty is a "personal duty, meaning [officers] can be prosecuted for failing to meet their due diligence obligations", the guide says. "Prosecution typically requires proof that the officer failed to take reasonable steps to comply with their duty, assessed in the context of the organisation's overall safety and health management system," it says. These due diligence obligations apply to paid directors, and are "recommended" for volunteer directors, who can be prosecuted in limited circumstances. "While non-executive directors have not been the focus of WHS regulators to date, this can change, and regulatory expectations are rising," the guide notes. According to the 12-page document , company boards and governance play a crucial role in ensuring psychosocial risks are managed effectively. Directors must oversee management's efforts at identifying and implementing control measures, set expectations and confirm that the necessary frameworks are in place. "This includes seeking information, reviewing board reports, assessing organisational culture, and challenging management where needed to strengthen risk controls," the guide says. Examples of how boards should address the workplace factors that create psychosocial risks include: Overseeing how managers monitor the risks associated with work design by drawing on complaints data, employee surveys, and absence and turnover rates, and engaging regularly with management to assess risks and evaluate measures; Confirming that management is complying with the positive duty to eliminate workplace sexual harassment, and obtaining regular reports on key behavioural risks involving code of conduct breaches and harassment cases; Setting expectations for management to provide workers with practical assistance and timely consultation in the event of organisational change and restructures, which can create significant stress; Engaging with management to review how it is addressing remote work risks, and ensuring there they have a clear policy to guide them in determining when remote arrangements are appropriate; and Overseeing how HR and performance management processes are managed, and confirming that investigation procedures are fair, workers have access to appropriate support, and outcomes are handled as consistently as possible. Governing WHS Psychosocial Risks: A primer for directors, by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and King & Wood Mallesons, April 2025 This article has been reproduced with permission from OHS Alert, and the original version appears at www.ohsalert.com.au.
April 7, 2025
Zenergy recently hosted Women in Safety, a special networking event dedicated to fostering collaboration in the health, safety, and wellbeing sector. Held on March 20, 2025, at The Winery, Surry Hills, this event provided a relaxed and welcoming atmosphere where professionals gathered to exchange insights, share experiences, and build meaningful connections. With attendees from diverse industries—including construction, logistics, corporate sectors, and more—the event highlighted the vital role of women in shaping safer workplaces across Australia.
March 25, 2025
Podcasts have become a dominant force in the world of media, revolutionising how we consume information and entertainment and the WHS, Environment & Sustainability is no different! As the podcast industry continues to expand, listeners are discovering a wealth of benefits, from educational insights to fostering community connections. In this article, we share some of the leading podcasts and why they’ve become a growing part of modern WHS, Environment & Sustainability consumption. Here are some of the leading podcasts that every WHS, Environmental, and Sustainability professional should tune into:
March 24, 2025
Colin Hansen, WHS Director John Holland - M7M12 Project
March 3, 2025
Zenergy invites you to be part of the prestigious 2025 Australian Workplace Health & Safety Awards (AWHSA) —a national platform dedicated to recognising outstanding achievements in workplace health and safety. These awards celebrate individuals and organisations that are making a real impact in fostering safer, healthier work environments.
February 28, 2025
Australia has enacted mandatory sustainability reporting requirements, effective from 1 January 2025, through the Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Act 2024. These regulations mandate that large entities disclose climate-related financial information as part of their annual reporting obligations.
More Posts