Lack of refresher training leads to pinning and prosecution

An employer that failed to re-induct or provide refresher training to a worker, when he was transferred to a different department, has been fined for safety breaches, after the man was struck by a 2.3-tonne load in a forklift incident.


NSW District Court Judge David Russell convicted and fined Crawfords Freightlines Pty Ltd $90,000, after a 25 per cent discount for its plea of guilty to breaching sections 19 and 32 of the State WHS Act.


He found Crawfords should have implemented a safe work method for placing cardboard between bundles of aluminium billets being loaded into shipping containers, “whereby no more than one person at a time was inside any shipping containers in which a forklift was in operation”.


In September 2018, the worker was taping cardboard between billets, to prevent the billets from rubbing together, when the load from a forklift entering the shipping container he was in fell and pinned him against the wall.


Judge Russell heard the worker was assigned to the “alloy department” three days before he was struck.


He heard the worker undertook training in Crawfords’ standard operating procedures (SOPs) for operating forklift trucks, and for unloading and packing aluminium, when he was first employed at the company’s Sandgate site six months earlier.


The latter was not applicable to the work he performed when he first started, and when he was moved to the alloy department he was not re-inducted, retrained or provided with any refresher training on this SOP or on loading and packing aluminium generally, he heard. In any event, neither SOP specifically dealt with placing cardboard between bundles of aluminium billets.


The SOP for unloading and packing aluminium did prohibit personnel from being inside a container while it was being loaded, except when disconnecting slings or straps, but there was “no specific prohibition against workers remaining inside a shipping container when placing cardboard between aluminium billets, while forklift trucks were also being operated inside the same container”, Judge Russell noted.


He also found Crawfords had a job cycle observation system for assessing adherence to SOPs, but no formal process for tracking whether its compliance team, supervisors or leading hands were applying it.


Judge Russell said Crawfords’ failure to train the worker in a safe method for placing cardboard within the shipping container gave rise to a high likelihood of him being struck by a falling load while standing near a forklift.


He said there would not have been a significant burden or cost involved in ensuring the worker’s safety, as the employer did promptly after the incident.

Its responses included changing its system of work to require forklift operators to work alone packing billets into shipping containers, and to position and tape the cardboard against the billets while the forklift was not in operation, he heard.


Judge Russell took into account the fact that both the injured worker and the forklift driver involved in the incident were ticketed and trained in the employer’s general prohibition against workers being inside shipping containers when forklifts were operating.


“I find that the level of culpability of Crawfords is in the lower half of the mid-range,” he said in finding the appropriate pre-discount fine was $120,000.


SafeWork NSW v Crawfords Freightlines Pty Ltd [2021] NSWDC 442 (27 August 2021)

Contact Us

Zenergy News

Psychosocial Hazards Are Now a Core WHS Obligation — Is Your Organisation Ready?

April 8, 2026
From December 2025, psychosocial hazards are a core WHS obligation in Australia. Learn what’s changed, what regulators expect, and how to prepare your organisation.

Safety Leadership in Complex Operations: Insights from Dr Emily Novatsis

By • March 24, 2026
Dr Emily Novatsis shares insights on leadership, risk management, safety culture, and transitioning from compliance to performance-driven safety in rail operations.

AI, Regulation & the Future of Safety: Key Takeaways from the AIHS NSW Safety Symposium 2026

By Tom Desborough • March 23, 2026
Discover key WHS insights from the AIHS NSW Safety Symposium 2026, including AI regulation, psychosocial safety trends, and future workforce impacts.
Psychosocial Regulation in Victoria: Is Your Safety Capability Ready?

Psychosocial Regulation Has Landed. Is Your Safety Capability Ready?

By Jo Retallick • March 2, 2026
Victoria’s new psychosocial health regulations are here. Learn why compliance isn’t enough and how HSE capability reduces mental injury risk.

Principles of Workplace Incident Investigations

February 23, 2026
Learn the fundamentals of workplace incident investigations with Zenergy’s eLearning course. Identify causes, implement actions, and improve workplace safety.
Alcohol and Other Drugs in the Workplace

Alcohol and Other Drugs in the Workplace

February 16, 2026
Learn how alcohol and other drugs impact workplace safety with Zenergy’s eLearning course to maintain a safe, healthy, and compliant work environment.
More Posts

Our Offices

Sydney

25 Brisbane Street

Surry Hills NSW 2010


Melbourne

Level 23, Tower 5

Collins Square

727 Collins Street

Melbourne VIC 3008


Brisbane

Level 54

111 Eagle Street

Brisbane QLD 4000


Perth

108 St Georges Terrace

Perth WA 6000