Industrial Manslaughter – Up to 20 Years Imprisonment and Maximum AUD10 Million Fine for Corporate Offenders

A Melbourne meat processor has been convicted and fined $130,000 after a worker’s hand was trapped and crushed in a waste chute while he was trying to retrieve a knife that had fallen in.

The incident


The worker was employed by an export certified meat processing business in a suburb of Melbourne. He was operating a casing machine when a knife fell into an offal waste chute and he reached in to retrieve it. His hand and arm became trapped and crushed by a pneumatic ram 45cm below the chute that pushed the waste into a disposal area.

The worker’s hand was able to be surgically reattached, but he remained off work due to medical complications with his rehabilitation.

The company had identified the risk before the incident and installed a guard above the opening of the offal chute, but it was found to be inadequate as it still allowed employees to access the danger area.

Within a day of the injury, the company installed a different guard that prevented access to the danger area below the waste chute.


In court


The business was prosecuted by WorkSafe Victoria for failing to adequately guard plant, and the case was heard in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court.

The company pleaded guilty. It was convicted, and fined $130,000.

Previous hand injury


This was not the first time a serious hand injury had occurred at the business. In 2007 a worker was injured while loading and clearing a mixing machine. He had removed the covers as the meat was building up behind them and he was having difficulty in getting the tubs to come away from the machine. He replaced the covers to blend a new batch of meat and then removed them again to empty the machine out.


As he reached over to turn the machine off with his left hand, his right hand came into contact with the mixer paddle inside the mixing machine, resulting in three of his fingers being severed. He was taken to hospital where he underwent surgery to re-attach his fingers. He later needed several more operations to facilitate the operation of his fingers.


After the incident, the company implemented a number of remedial measures including the installation of an effective guarding system for that part of the process, together with an electrical interlock at the end of the machine where the meat was removed, and a new electrical interlock switch to the top door of the machine.

Hand injuries in meat processing


Injuries to hands, fingers and thumbs are unfortunately not uncommon in meat processing, due to the nature of the work and the types of equipment and machinery used.


WorkSafe’s Executive Director of Health and Safety said safety around plant and machinery should not be left to the discretion of workers.

‘It is up to employers to ensure the highest level of protection,’ she said.


‘This includes the fitting of appropriate guards or barriers so moving parts cannot be touched or accessed while the machine is operating.’

Employers responsibilities for machine guarding


Managing the risks involves a systematic process of identifying and assessing the hazards, including regular inspection and maintenance, and an examination of existing guarding to determine whether it is sufficient to prevent an injury.


It is also important to look at the position from which the machinery is operated, and to assess whether a person could be struck by, or entangled, in moving parts.


Workers’ tasks should be considered in detail, and not just during normal operation, as accidents are often more likely to occur if something goes wrong, for example, if something jams or blocks the normal process and a worker may be tempted to reach in and remove the obstruction or retrieve something that has been dropped.


Staff training is vital, along with assessment and supervision to make sure instructions have been understood and safe work procedures are complied with. If a worker’s first language is not English, it may be appropriate to provide training, information and on-the-job instruction in the worker’s own language. Merely handing someone written instructions in English, or giving them a rapid and perfunctory induction is unlikely to be adequate.


Originally posted on Workplace OHS

Contact Us

Zenergy News

Directors' duties for psych risks unpacked in new report
April 23, 2025
The WHS obligations of company directors include taking reasonable steps to understand the psychological hazards in their workplaces, and this is a "personal" prosecutable duty, a new guide for directors warns. Directors' obligations include establishing that their organisations and their management "are equipped with appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise these risks to the extent that is reasonably practicable", the guide by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and law firm King & Wood Mallesons says. Most of any organisation's work to address psychosocial hazards will be "driven by management", given the complexity of the risks and the deep operational knowledge required to guide action, it says. "The board plays a supporting role in constructively challenging these efforts and maintaining oversight of how effective psychosocial risk management contributes to broader organisational culture and leadership." Under Australia's national model WHS laws – adopted by all jurisdictions other than Victoria, which has similar legislation – officers have a duty to exercise due diligence to confirm their organisation is meeting its WHS obligations. (See section 27 of NSW's version of the laws, for example.) This duty is a "personal duty, meaning [officers] can be prosecuted for failing to meet their due diligence obligations", the guide says. "Prosecution typically requires proof that the officer failed to take reasonable steps to comply with their duty, assessed in the context of the organisation's overall safety and health management system," it says. These due diligence obligations apply to paid directors, and are "recommended" for volunteer directors, who can be prosecuted in limited circumstances. "While non-executive directors have not been the focus of WHS regulators to date, this can change, and regulatory expectations are rising," the guide notes. According to the 12-page document , company boards and governance play a crucial role in ensuring psychosocial risks are managed effectively. Directors must oversee management's efforts at identifying and implementing control measures, set expectations and confirm that the necessary frameworks are in place. "This includes seeking information, reviewing board reports, assessing organisational culture, and challenging management where needed to strengthen risk controls," the guide says. Examples of how boards should address the workplace factors that create psychosocial risks include: Overseeing how managers monitor the risks associated with work design by drawing on complaints data, employee surveys, and absence and turnover rates, and engaging regularly with management to assess risks and evaluate measures; Confirming that management is complying with the positive duty to eliminate workplace sexual harassment, and obtaining regular reports on key behavioural risks involving code of conduct breaches and harassment cases; Setting expectations for management to provide workers with practical assistance and timely consultation in the event of organisational change and restructures, which can create significant stress; Engaging with management to review how it is addressing remote work risks, and ensuring there they have a clear policy to guide them in determining when remote arrangements are appropriate; and Overseeing how HR and performance management processes are managed, and confirming that investigation procedures are fair, workers have access to appropriate support, and outcomes are handled as consistently as possible. Governing WHS Psychosocial Risks: A primer for directors, by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and King & Wood Mallesons, April 2025 This article has been reproduced with permission from OHS Alert, and the original version appears at www.ohsalert.com.au.
April 7, 2025
Zenergy recently hosted Women in Safety, a special networking event dedicated to fostering collaboration in the health, safety, and wellbeing sector. Held on March 20, 2025, at The Winery, Surry Hills, this event provided a relaxed and welcoming atmosphere where professionals gathered to exchange insights, share experiences, and build meaningful connections. With attendees from diverse industries—including construction, logistics, corporate sectors, and more—the event highlighted the vital role of women in shaping safer workplaces across Australia.
March 25, 2025
Podcasts have become a dominant force in the world of media, revolutionising how we consume information and entertainment and the WHS, Environment & Sustainability is no different! As the podcast industry continues to expand, listeners are discovering a wealth of benefits, from educational insights to fostering community connections. In this article, we share some of the leading podcasts and why they’ve become a growing part of modern WHS, Environment & Sustainability consumption. Here are some of the leading podcasts that every WHS, Environmental, and Sustainability professional should tune into:
March 24, 2025
Colin Hansen, WHS Director John Holland - M7M12 Project
March 3, 2025
Zenergy invites you to be part of the prestigious 2025 Australian Workplace Health & Safety Awards (AWHSA) —a national platform dedicated to recognising outstanding achievements in workplace health and safety. These awards celebrate individuals and organisations that are making a real impact in fostering safer, healthier work environments.
February 28, 2025
Australia has enacted mandatory sustainability reporting requirements, effective from 1 January 2025, through the Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Act 2024. These regulations mandate that large entities disclose climate-related financial information as part of their annual reporting obligations.
More Posts