Alcohol-related injury at work party deemed compensable, bench dismisses reliance on High Court test

Alcohol-related injury at work party deemed compensable, bench dismisses reliance on High Court test



The injuries sustained by a worker at an alcohol-fuelled work Christmas party occurred in the course of her employment and not during a "social" activity, an appeals bench has ruled in rejecting a regulator's bid to block her claim.


Deputy President Judges Tony Rossi and Miles Crawley and Deputy President Stephen Lieschke of the South Australian Employment Tribunal rejected ReturnToWork SA's submission that the function was a social event that fell within the exclusion outlined in section 7(7) of the State Return to Work Act 2014.

ReturnToWork relied on several High Court cases in arguing the worker's employer had not "induced or encouraged" her to attend the Christmas party, meaning it was not liable for her injuries.


However, the full bench pointed out that the High Court's test of inducement only applied to injuries sustained during an "interval" within an overall period of work where the worker was situated, at the request of the employer, at a "remote" location.

The current case was not a remote location case, the bench found.


The incident occurred in November 2018 when the worker – a hairdresser employed by Karrara Hair and Beauty Centre – attended a fully-paid-for work Christmas Party at the invitation of her employer.


The event was held at a resort in Aldinga and involved overnight accommodation, lunch, unlimited alcohol, a spa bath and a male stripper. While under the influence of alcohol, the worker attempted to step out of the spa but slipped on the tiles and fell, sustaining hip and leg injuries.

The worker applied to ReturnToWork for medical expenses and weekly incapacity payments, but was denied these on the basis that she had not been directed to attend the party and, as such, had failed to prove the injury occurred in the course of her employment.


In reviewing the regulator's decision earlier this year, SAET Deputy President Judge Mark Calligeros heard Karrara's annual Christmas party was a significant event for the company with the owner closing the salon for the weekend and describing it as a time when staff could "let their hair down."

He found the employer "actively fostered the attendance and participation of employees in the event" by providing alcohol, accommodation, amenities, a spa bath and a stripper, and gave the employees "a very wide discretion or choice as to how they could behave".


He concluded that the worker had been encouraged to attend the Christmas function and "tacitly or impliedly invited" to participate in its activities, including using the spa bath that caused the injury.


He noted video footage showed the owner directing the worker and other staff members to exit the spa bath due to their intoxication, which was further evidence that the event was a "work-related function", and not purely a social event.


Deputy President Judge Calligeros went on to find the worker's employment was a significant contributing factor to her injury, as required by section 7(2)(a) of the RTW Act.


"A number of the decisions and actions of [the employer] significantly contributed to the occurrence of the injury suffered by [the worker]. This included the nature of the venue, the supply of alcohol and the expressed desire that the employees have a good time," he said.


ReturnToWork appealed, but Deputy President Judges Rossi and Crawley and Deputy President Lieschke rejected its submissions.

They highlighted that the worker "did not engage in a frolic of her own" and using the spa bath was "within the scope" of activities Karrara requested the worker undertake.


The full bench found no error in the previous decision, ruling the worker's employment gave rise to the circumstances that led to her slipping and falling and injuring her right hip and leg.


Return to Work Corporation of South Australia v Valentine and Karrara Hair and Beauty Centre [2022] SAET 134 (4 October 2022)


“This article originally appeared on OHS Alert and is reproduced with permission”

Contact Us

Zenergy News

Directors' duties for psych risks unpacked in new report
April 23, 2025
The WHS obligations of company directors include taking reasonable steps to understand the psychological hazards in their workplaces, and this is a "personal" prosecutable duty, a new guide for directors warns. Directors' obligations include establishing that their organisations and their management "are equipped with appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise these risks to the extent that is reasonably practicable", the guide by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and law firm King & Wood Mallesons says. Most of any organisation's work to address psychosocial hazards will be "driven by management", given the complexity of the risks and the deep operational knowledge required to guide action, it says. "The board plays a supporting role in constructively challenging these efforts and maintaining oversight of how effective psychosocial risk management contributes to broader organisational culture and leadership." Under Australia's national model WHS laws – adopted by all jurisdictions other than Victoria, which has similar legislation – officers have a duty to exercise due diligence to confirm their organisation is meeting its WHS obligations. (See section 27 of NSW's version of the laws, for example.) This duty is a "personal duty, meaning [officers] can be prosecuted for failing to meet their due diligence obligations", the guide says. "Prosecution typically requires proof that the officer failed to take reasonable steps to comply with their duty, assessed in the context of the organisation's overall safety and health management system," it says. These due diligence obligations apply to paid directors, and are "recommended" for volunteer directors, who can be prosecuted in limited circumstances. "While non-executive directors have not been the focus of WHS regulators to date, this can change, and regulatory expectations are rising," the guide notes. According to the 12-page document , company boards and governance play a crucial role in ensuring psychosocial risks are managed effectively. Directors must oversee management's efforts at identifying and implementing control measures, set expectations and confirm that the necessary frameworks are in place. "This includes seeking information, reviewing board reports, assessing organisational culture, and challenging management where needed to strengthen risk controls," the guide says. Examples of how boards should address the workplace factors that create psychosocial risks include: Overseeing how managers monitor the risks associated with work design by drawing on complaints data, employee surveys, and absence and turnover rates, and engaging regularly with management to assess risks and evaluate measures; Confirming that management is complying with the positive duty to eliminate workplace sexual harassment, and obtaining regular reports on key behavioural risks involving code of conduct breaches and harassment cases; Setting expectations for management to provide workers with practical assistance and timely consultation in the event of organisational change and restructures, which can create significant stress; Engaging with management to review how it is addressing remote work risks, and ensuring there they have a clear policy to guide them in determining when remote arrangements are appropriate; and Overseeing how HR and performance management processes are managed, and confirming that investigation procedures are fair, workers have access to appropriate support, and outcomes are handled as consistently as possible. Governing WHS Psychosocial Risks: A primer for directors, by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and King & Wood Mallesons, April 2025 This article has been reproduced with permission from OHS Alert, and the original version appears at www.ohsalert.com.au.
April 7, 2025
Zenergy recently hosted Women in Safety, a special networking event dedicated to fostering collaboration in the health, safety, and wellbeing sector. Held on March 20, 2025, at The Winery, Surry Hills, this event provided a relaxed and welcoming atmosphere where professionals gathered to exchange insights, share experiences, and build meaningful connections. With attendees from diverse industries—including construction, logistics, corporate sectors, and more—the event highlighted the vital role of women in shaping safer workplaces across Australia.
March 25, 2025
Podcasts have become a dominant force in the world of media, revolutionising how we consume information and entertainment and the WHS, Environment & Sustainability is no different! As the podcast industry continues to expand, listeners are discovering a wealth of benefits, from educational insights to fostering community connections. In this article, we share some of the leading podcasts and why they’ve become a growing part of modern WHS, Environment & Sustainability consumption. Here are some of the leading podcasts that every WHS, Environmental, and Sustainability professional should tune into:
March 24, 2025
Colin Hansen, WHS Director John Holland - M7M12 Project
March 3, 2025
Zenergy invites you to be part of the prestigious 2025 Australian Workplace Health & Safety Awards (AWHSA) —a national platform dedicated to recognising outstanding achievements in workplace health and safety. These awards celebrate individuals and organisations that are making a real impact in fostering safer, healthier work environments.
February 28, 2025
Australia has enacted mandatory sustainability reporting requirements, effective from 1 January 2025, through the Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Act 2024. These regulations mandate that large entities disclose climate-related financial information as part of their annual reporting obligations.
More Posts