Record $2.31m recklessness fine follows four deaths, sends safety warning to company officers


Record $2.31m recklessness fine follows four deaths, sends safety warning to company officers

This article has been reproduced with permission from OHS Alert, and the original version appears at www.ohsalert.com.au


Company executives must ensure systems are in place to deal with non-compliance with safety requirements and those systems are properly monitored, a regulator has stressed after an employer was handed a record recklessness fine relating to the deaths of four police officers.

The NSW Downing Centre Local Court found an appropriate penalty for Connect Logistics Pty Ltd's breaches of the Heavy Vehicle National Law was $2.8 million, before reducing this to $2.31 million to reflect the company's guilty plea.


This was the highest fine ever imposed under the HVNL, National Heavy Vehicle Regulator prosecutions director Belinda Hughes said.

Connect Logistics was also barred from operating for 12 months, while its managing director Corey Matthews was convicted and fined $22,500 and placed on a supervisory intervention order, Hughes said.

"This case demonstrates the national reach of the HVNL, with the company and managing director based in NSW, but the incident occurring in Victoria," she stressed.


In April 2020, a truck engaged by Connect Logistics was travelling along Melbourne's Eastern Freeway when the driver, Mohinder Singh, fell asleep at the wheel and the vehicle crashed into two police cars involved in a traffic stop, killing the four police officers.

Singh, who was driving under the influence of drugs, was eventually jailed for at least 14 years and six months, while Connect Logistics and Matthews were charged with breaching NSW's version of the HVNL, and Singh's Connect Logistics supervisor Simiona Tuteru was charged with four counts of manslaughter under Victorian law.

The Victorian Director of Public Prosecutions subsequently withdrew the manslaughter charges against Tuteru, and sought to prosecute him for allegedly recklessly breaching his HVNL duty as a party in the chain of responsibility for a heavy vehicle by allowing Singh and others "to drive in excess of their permitted work or rest hours".


As reported by OHS Alert, the Victorian Court of Appeal recently cleared the way for the DPP to pursue that matter.

In the NSW case at hand, Local Court Magistrate John Arms heard Connect Logistics was charged with a category-1 recklessness offence under the HVNL for failing to implement systems to properly manage its truck drivers' fatigue and fitness for duty. He heard Matthews was charged with failing to exercise due diligence to ensure his company complied with its safety duties, and stressed that a company director cannot put "his hands over his ears and his eyes" to avoid safety responsibilities.


Prior to the quadruple fatality, Matthews became aware of problems with his drivers' time sheets and took some steps to address the issue, but then "accepted the word of someone that was [part of] the problem" that the issue had been resolved, and "didn't do anything further", the Magistrate said.

An NHVR investigation found that in the seven months leading up to the deaths, more than 40 per cent of Connect Logistics' driving shifts featured one or more fatigue-related breaches, and the supervisor checked and endorsed more than 500 of the 800-plus offending shifts. It found falsified timesheets were approved by senior management and no non-conformance reports were issued to any drivers.


In a report on the case, the NHVR said key takeaways for executives include that they must have a system in place to deal with non-compliance with HVNL provisions, monitor adherence to the system, and proactively ensure compliance-related activities are occurring, instead of relying on the word of others.


"There is no point having procedures and policies where the drivers are not aware of them or trained in them," the NHVR said.


"Responses to any breaches of the HVNL must be real and timely. As an executive, remain proactive in your organisation's business activities and request regular briefings from your staff to ensure you remain up to date with developments and risks," it said.


"As an executive you cannot push your responsibility onto others."


In a statement, NHVR CEO Sal Petroccitto said "chain-of-responsibility requirements form part of the HVNL primary safety duty and executives are required to exercise due diligence to ensure a company complies with this duty".


"This tragedy is a sobering reminder of the consequences that can occur when there is a failure to ensure safe transport activities," he said.


"Fatigue is one of the leading factors that affects safety and heavy vehicle crashes, and this catastrophic incident exemplifies what can happen when fatigue management requirements are blatantly ignored."


Contact Us

Zenergy News

Directors' duties for psych risks unpacked in new report
April 23, 2025
The WHS obligations of company directors include taking reasonable steps to understand the psychological hazards in their workplaces, and this is a "personal" prosecutable duty, a new guide for directors warns. Directors' obligations include establishing that their organisations and their management "are equipped with appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise these risks to the extent that is reasonably practicable", the guide by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and law firm King & Wood Mallesons says. Most of any organisation's work to address psychosocial hazards will be "driven by management", given the complexity of the risks and the deep operational knowledge required to guide action, it says. "The board plays a supporting role in constructively challenging these efforts and maintaining oversight of how effective psychosocial risk management contributes to broader organisational culture and leadership." Under Australia's national model WHS laws – adopted by all jurisdictions other than Victoria, which has similar legislation – officers have a duty to exercise due diligence to confirm their organisation is meeting its WHS obligations. (See section 27 of NSW's version of the laws, for example.) This duty is a "personal duty, meaning [officers] can be prosecuted for failing to meet their due diligence obligations", the guide says. "Prosecution typically requires proof that the officer failed to take reasonable steps to comply with their duty, assessed in the context of the organisation's overall safety and health management system," it says. These due diligence obligations apply to paid directors, and are "recommended" for volunteer directors, who can be prosecuted in limited circumstances. "While non-executive directors have not been the focus of WHS regulators to date, this can change, and regulatory expectations are rising," the guide notes. According to the 12-page document , company boards and governance play a crucial role in ensuring psychosocial risks are managed effectively. Directors must oversee management's efforts at identifying and implementing control measures, set expectations and confirm that the necessary frameworks are in place. "This includes seeking information, reviewing board reports, assessing organisational culture, and challenging management where needed to strengthen risk controls," the guide says. Examples of how boards should address the workplace factors that create psychosocial risks include: Overseeing how managers monitor the risks associated with work design by drawing on complaints data, employee surveys, and absence and turnover rates, and engaging regularly with management to assess risks and evaluate measures; Confirming that management is complying with the positive duty to eliminate workplace sexual harassment, and obtaining regular reports on key behavioural risks involving code of conduct breaches and harassment cases; Setting expectations for management to provide workers with practical assistance and timely consultation in the event of organisational change and restructures, which can create significant stress; Engaging with management to review how it is addressing remote work risks, and ensuring there they have a clear policy to guide them in determining when remote arrangements are appropriate; and Overseeing how HR and performance management processes are managed, and confirming that investigation procedures are fair, workers have access to appropriate support, and outcomes are handled as consistently as possible. Governing WHS Psychosocial Risks: A primer for directors, by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and King & Wood Mallesons, April 2025 This article has been reproduced with permission from OHS Alert, and the original version appears at www.ohsalert.com.au.
April 7, 2025
Zenergy recently hosted Women in Safety, a special networking event dedicated to fostering collaboration in the health, safety, and wellbeing sector. Held on March 20, 2025, at The Winery, Surry Hills, this event provided a relaxed and welcoming atmosphere where professionals gathered to exchange insights, share experiences, and build meaningful connections. With attendees from diverse industries—including construction, logistics, corporate sectors, and more—the event highlighted the vital role of women in shaping safer workplaces across Australia.
March 25, 2025
Podcasts have become a dominant force in the world of media, revolutionising how we consume information and entertainment and the WHS, Environment & Sustainability is no different! As the podcast industry continues to expand, listeners are discovering a wealth of benefits, from educational insights to fostering community connections. In this article, we share some of the leading podcasts and why they’ve become a growing part of modern WHS, Environment & Sustainability consumption. Here are some of the leading podcasts that every WHS, Environmental, and Sustainability professional should tune into:
March 24, 2025
Colin Hansen, WHS Director John Holland - M7M12 Project
March 3, 2025
Zenergy invites you to be part of the prestigious 2025 Australian Workplace Health & Safety Awards (AWHSA) —a national platform dedicated to recognising outstanding achievements in workplace health and safety. These awards celebrate individuals and organisations that are making a real impact in fostering safer, healthier work environments.
February 28, 2025
Australia has enacted mandatory sustainability reporting requirements, effective from 1 January 2025, through the Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Act 2024. These regulations mandate that large entities disclose climate-related financial information as part of their annual reporting obligations.
More Posts